Worldwide Distortions Due To US Federal Reserve

by Doug Noland September 23, 2011 Portions taken from Prudent Bear
With “operation twist,” the Bernanke Fed this week has moved decidedly in the direction of “pegging” the entire Treasury yield curve – along with the prices of Trillions of U.S. debt securities. In a world of escalating instability, this provides U.S. debt securities a (short-term) competitive advantage over debt securities in, say, Europe, “developing” Asia, Brazil and Mexico. In a different market environment this wouldn’t be such a big deal.

For going on three years now, the global leveraged speculating community has been positioning for ongoing dollar devaluation. The Washington policy playbook ensured massive Treasury issuance, zero rates, and unprecedented central bank monetization. Chairman Bernanke essentially signaled to the hedge funds to short the dollar and take the proceeds and acquire any higher-returning asset anywhere in the world. A strong case can be made that never in history has policymaking so incentivized global leveraged speculation. The leveraged players anticipated riding QE1 to QE15, not a policy course that would abruptly stop at QE2 and do a twist – especially not in the midst of a global crisis and de-risking environment.

Anyway, post-2008 reflation stoked a massive flow of “hot money” that inundated the “developing” world, where domestic Credit systems were already firing on all cylinders. It was a historic boom – as well as a fundamental facet of my “global government finance Bubble” thesis. And the more these currencies, markets and economies inflated, the greater the self-reinforcing flow of finance from U.S. and international investors into global funds and “developing” bonds and equities. Those with longer memories may recall the analogies of emerging markets to “roach motels” or “Hotel California.”

In a week when ECB President Trichet and Pimco’s El-Erian both referred to a global sovereign debt crisis, the scope of market tumult broadened meaningfully. Importantly, de-risking/de-leveraging dynamics intensified, and “developing” bond markets started to come unglued. Emerging debt spreads widened dramatically. In the (dislocating) Credit default swap market (CDS), the cost to protect against default in Brazil surged 53 bps to 211, in Mexico 58 bps to 216, Argentina 185 bps to 1,052, South Korea 40 bps to 187, Poland 74 bps to 312, Hungary 79 bps to 531 and Russia 93 bps to 310. Commodities were also crushed, with silver down 26.3%, copper 16.6%, coffee 12.4%, crude oil 9.4%, sugar 9.7%, cotton 8.3%, and gasoline 8.2%. In “developing” currencies, the South African rand dropped 7.7%, the Chilean peso 7.2%, the Brazilian real 5.5%, the Mexican peso 3.8%, the Russian ruble 4.8%, the South Korean won 4.7%, the Singapore dollar 4.4%, the Indian rupee 4.4%, and the Polish zloty 3.9%. Basically, it was a slaughter.

The focus remains the unfolding Greek and European debt crisis. But there were further indications this week that the global leveraged players now face a heightened state of duress. You were absolutely hammered this week if you were short Treasurys (or U.S. dollar securities) against long positions in global risk assets. And there seems to be evidence of forced liquidations everywhere, as a 2008-like scenario comes into clearer view. The bursting of the Bubbles in global leveraged speculation and the associated reversal of finance away from the “developing” world portends tightened financial conditions and growth headwinds for the post-2008 crisis global growth “locomotive.” This more than justifies the pounding that global cyclical stocks suffered this week.

I’ve been really worrying about the European banks; about global derivatives; about the unwind of leveraged trades throughout global markets. This week’s policy and market developments only added to my anxiety, while confirming my view that risks are greater today than in 2008. And it’s quite a contrast between the escalating global financial crisis and the rather sanguine consensus view for the U.S. economy and markets. And I’ll be the first to admit that, with the Fed and global central banks still willingly accommodating Washington profligacy, the Government Finance Bubble-driven U.S. economy does appear, for now, relatively isolated from global crisis dynamics. If I only had a dollar for every time I’ve heard “selling is overdone.”

Much to the U.S. stock market’s relief, our policymakers retain the capacity to continue stimulating. The Treasury will keep issuing, and the Fed will keep experimenting. And wouldn’t it be ironic if this dynamic now works to bolster (the reversal of) flows into dollar assets, only intensifying the problematic squeeze on a vulnerable global leveraged speculating community. It is not easy to envisage a scenario that would, at this point, reverse global risk aversion and de-leveraging. But, then again, most participants seem more fixated on areas of market technical support that could signal the rush of sideline cash into U.S. equities. Not the mood one would expect at an important market bottom.

Where is The Stock Market Headed in USA? Sept 22,2011

Using Technical indicators, DJIA made a high in the last two years on May 2, 2011 equal to 12,876.
Since that time , the market has been going down in 5 LEGS
: one down, two up , a long & deep 3 down, a shallow LEG 4 up and then final LEG 5 down.
Unfortunately, we have not even completed LEG one down yet, because LEG one down itself has 5 steps : one down, two up, a sharp sep 3 down , then 4th step up and finally 5 step down.Let us explain it further.

LEG One down started on May 2, 2011 at 12876. In its first step down, it went to 11886 on June 15, 2011 and went upto 12779 on July 7, 2011. From there it moved down to 10604 in step 3 down on August 9, 2011.It completed step 4 up on August 31 at approximately 11716. It has been going down since then in Step 5 down.

Those who are familiar with Elliott Wave Theory know that Step 5 down itself has 5 parts.Part one down was completed on Sept 6 at 10932 followed by part two up on Sept. 20 , 2011 at 11550.Part 3 Down may have been completed today (Sept 22) or will make a new low by early morning on Sept. 23, 2011. Part 4 up may have started today or start early on Sept 23 and will end soon.It will be followed by step 5 down. This will complete the LEG One down.

It will be followed by a huge rally in LEG 2. Follow us to understand how deep the upward movement is and how long it will last.Subscribe to our weekly newsletter. To understand please read Chapter 5 of our book
“Dodging The Depression”

Monetary Stimulus in UK Will not Solve UK’s Problems

Published: Thursday, 22 Sep 2011 | 5:26 AM ET Text Size
By: Shai Ahmed
CNBC Associate Editor

More monetary stimulus by the UK could lead to more inflation and not much economic growth, a former member of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee told CNBC Thursday.

Sharon Lorimer

“It won’t be particularly effective and could do harm. It has already been taken to extreme levels. The policy in 2009 of quantitative easing was effective because it was trying to stabilize a very difficult situation in the economy and unconventional measures like QE are best when deployed with shock and awe.

“It won’t address the key issue which is high inflation. This is squeezing disposable income and consumer spending and that’s one of the main reasons we are seeing weaker growth now, the inflationary question of QE is important,” Andrew Sentance, former MPC member, Bank of England told CNBC.

Earlier this week minutes from the last MPC meeting, held earlier this month, showed that the committee had considered further quantitative easing, with most members feeling that an additional round of monetary easing of around 50 billion pounds ($78 billion) will be necessary in the coming months.

The MPC voted 8-1 against more monetary stimulus at the September meeting.

Sentance argued that the MPC was now facing credibility issues as it fought to control rising inflation in the UK.

“It’s votes that count at the MPC and their mandate is an inflation target of 2 percent and they have consistently overshot it and consistently underestimated some of the external inflationary pressures,” he said.

Wednesday saw the US Federal Reserve announce its latest attempt to boost the flagging US economy.

The much-anticipated ‘Operation Twist’ package will direct $400 billion from the sale of Treasurys of three years and less in duration and invest it in those of 6 to 30 years maturity.

RELATED LINKS
Bank of England Minutes Suggest More QE PossibleIMF Warns of ‘Weak and Bumpy’ Global RecoveryUK minister says Britain will stick to spending plans
Markets reacted disappointedly to the news compared to the last two rounds of QE proper, where the bank printed more money in an attempt to jump start the economy.

There was further gloom from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) , which released its economic forecasts for countries around the world.

The IMF warned that sluggish growth would be almost universal and cut forecasts for most developed countries. Britain was warned that its austerity program alone would not be enough to stimulate the economy and prevent another recession.

Sentance reiterated this view saying the economic problems had been dealt with in the short term but longer term economic policy must now be implemented.

“Monetary policy must shift away from an emergency setting. It may be difficult to have fiscal tightening but backtracking can be very painful for governments,” he said.

“Monetary policy makers should have been firmer about the limits of what monetary policy can do and they should have been moving towards medium term agenda. If we’re looking to support growth they need to make a better climate for business and reduce regulation and the supply side has not had enough focus in the policy mix over the last year or so,” he added.

© 2011 CNBC.com

IMF Warns of Euro Crisis Deepening

BRUSSELS: The IMF warned on Tuesday about the health of European banks exposed to the eurozone’s debt mountain, saying that if the crisis worsened global financial stability could be at risk.

“Should the periphery’s debt crisis continue to propagate to core euro area economies, there could be significant disruption to global financial stability,” the IMF said in a regular report on the world economy.

European banks are “heavily exposed” to countries facing rising borrowing costs and lenders should make efforts to increase their capital following holes revealed by recent “stress tests” on the sector, the IMF said.

“A concern is that capitalisation of euro area banks is relatively low, and they rely heavily on wholesale funding, which is prone to freezing during financial turmoil,” the report said.

“Trouble in a few sovereigns could thus quickly spread across Europe. From there it could move to the United States — by way of US institutional investors’ holdings of European assets — and to the rest of the world.”

European Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia said in a speech on Tuesday that banks may need to be recapitalised as the crisis worsens. Brussels previously said it believed banks were adequately capitalised.

“Strengthening the financial system remains a major priority,” the IMF said.

“Efforts to raise capital from private sources to fill the gaps identified during the recent stress tests should move ahead immediately and should be more ambitious than supervisors deemed necessary,” it added.

The Washingon-based organisation also called for “speedy implementation” of a debt crisis rescue package for Greece that was agreed at a July summit but is being held up by infighting among eurozone states.

The package would expand the powers of a crisis fund, enabling it to buy bonds of distressed nations as well as support bank capitalisation.

Copyright AFP (Agence France-Presse), 2011

Is The Fed Going To Do A Twist Sept 20, 2011 ??

By John W. Schoen, Senior Producer, CNBC
After pumping $2 trillion into the system, pushing interest rates to the floor and making a bold promise to keep rates low for two years, the Federal Reserve is running out of options.
Now, with the U.S. economy flagging and the European financial system under siege, it’s time to twist and shout.
“It’s a pretty critical meeting for the Fed,” said Jeffries market strategist David Zervos, a former Fed adviser. “It’s one of those meetings where we know there’s going to be a change. It’s not just the perfunctory ‘Let’s meet and greet and let’s make a statement that we’re vigilant and we know what we’re doing.”
With economic indicators flashing red around the world, U.S. central bankers are scrambling to try to revive growth. Most of their most effective tools have already been deployed. Deep cuts in short-term interest rates have slashed the cost of money for banks to near zero.
Since the housing market collapsed in 2007, the U.S. central bank has siphoned roughly $2 trillion worth of bonds – much of them backed by shaky mortgages – out of the banking system. More recently, Fed policy makers took the highly unusual step of promising to keep rates low for the next two years. Now, there’s little left to do but wait and hope the economy begins to heal on its own.
But Fed officials are determined to show the world that the central bank still has a few tricks up its sleeve. Fed watchers say two of them are likely candidates for the Fed’s official policy announcement when the meeting concludes on Wednesday.
Doing the Twist
One of those moves, dubbed “Operation Twist,” would represent a reshuffling of the bonds the Fed already holds in its vaults. By exchanging short-term notes for longer-term bonds, the Fed is hoping to push long-term rates even lower than the already bargain basement rate of roughly 2 percent.
Operation Twist won’t change the amount of money available for lending; when the Fed buys longer term-debt (adding dollars to the system) it’s expected to offset those purchases by selling short-term debt (taking the cash back.) The goal is to lower the overall level of interest rates – not unlike a homeowner swapping higher-rate credit card debt for a lower-rate home equity loan.
(The move, first tried in 1961 when the dance was invented, aims to “twist” the typical relationship between rates on short- and long-term debt.)
Lowering rates typically pushes bond prices higher, so anyone who already owns a Treasury bond makes a little money. Lowering rates also tends to prompt investors to look for higher yields from other investments, such as stocks, which helps support stock prices.
But the financial markets are already widely expecting Operation Twist. So even if the central bank follows through, it would have little or no impact, according to Nigel Gault, a senior economist at IHS Global Insight.
advertisement

“The Fed would have to seriously overshoot what the market is expecting to have any impact on long term yields,” he said. “This is not a big deal in terms of where long-term rates are. It makes a marginal difference. It’s not a game changer.”
Low Rate Shout-out
Fed watchers say the central bank may also beef up its typically opaque policy statement to add more weight to its announcement – call it “Operation Shout.” Fed officials recently amped up the wording of their usually bland communiqué with a pledge to keep rates low for the next two years. To take that pledge a step further, Fed officials could link that promise to specific targets for inflation or the jobless rate.
The odds of the Fed setting those targets are lower, say Fed watchers, because the central bankers would have to agree on the specific targets before they made them public. That consensus would be difficult to reach.
Beyond twisting and shouting, the Fed is running out of moves to bust out. One could involve cutting or eliminating the interest it pays banks to keep money parked in its vaults. The hope is that doing so would encourage banks to put those reserves to work by increasing their lending.
But bankers say they’re just not seeing the demand for more loans. That’s not likely to change as long as business leaders face major uncertainties about the health of U.S. global economy, the unraveling of Europe and ongoing deadlock over U.S. tax policy.
“I don’t think liquidity or rates are the issue in the economic recovery,” Kimberly Clark CEO Thomas Falk told CNBC. “I think there’s plenty of money out there, and rates are at historic lows in my lifetime. There’s just not much demand.”
As the U.S. economy falters, Europe has presented Fed officials with an even greater challenge. Last week, the U.S. central bank joined others around the world to open their “dollar windows” by offering to swap as many dollars for euros as the European banking system needs to fund its dollar-denominated loans. The U.S. banking system is believed to be relatively well ring-walled from the potential fallout of one or more European bank failures. But it’s impossible to predict just where the damage might be inflicted from another Lehman Brothers-like financial panic.
U.S. Fed officials are relying on their European counterparts of head off disaster. But the European Central Bank is badly split over how to deal with the crisis. It also has much less capital to work with then the U.S. central bank.
The historic strains on the system in the U.S. and the cloudy economic outlook have also left Fed policy makers divided on how to proceed. Some “hawks” on the policy-setting committee fear that too much easy-money policy will spark a surge in inflation that will be difficult to contain. On the other side of the table, the “doves” argue that the weak U.S. economy and banking crisis in Europe argue for more aggressive moves.

50th Wedding Anniversary For Sharmas

Part 1 50th Wedding Anniversary Celebration for Roma & Sagar Sharma 

Part 2 50th Wedding Anniversary Celebration for Roma & Sagar Sharma 

Part 3 50th Wedding Anniversary Celebration for Roma & Sagar Sharma

Part 4 50th Wedding Anniversary Celebration for Roma & Sagar Sharma

World’s 50 Safest Banks

WORLD’S 50 SAFEST BANKS 2011
For information on how to obtain Global Finance award logos please contact Chris Giarraputo at chris@gfmag.com or 212-524-3214.
——————————————————————————–

Share this
inShare76
Digg Del.icio.us Reddit StumbleUpon Technorati Newsvine Googlize thisPrintE-mailOrder Reprint

Global Finance names the World’s 50 Safest Banks 2011

NEW YORK, August 18, 2011 – Bank stability is an ever-more pressing concern for the world’s corporations and investors. It is within this context that Global Finance announces it’s 20th Annual Ranking of the World’s 50 Safest Banks.

The sovereign debt crisis is still raging in Europe and renewed fears of contagion from southern European countries is affecting banking and market outlooks throughout Europe.Global political instability is also in the spotlight—from the upheavals in the Middle East and Africa to the US debt downgrade by Standard & Poor’s, companies are watching closely to see how these events are affecting their counterparties.

With more than 40 of the top 50 banks from last year once again making the list, the Global Finance ranking shows that most of the top echelon of banks are truly worthy of the moniker World’s Safest Bank. Winners were selected through an evaluation of long-term credit ratings—from Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch—and total assets of the 500 largest banks worldwide.

Global Finance’s annual ranking of World’s 50 Safest Banks is a recognized and trusted standard of creditworthiness for the entire financial world. “Counterparty creditworthiness is a critical issue for companies and investors worldwide,” says Global Finance publisher Joseph D. Giarraputo. “More than ever, companies around the world are reevaluating the long-term credit strength of their banks, and partnering with only those banks that have proven strength and stability.”

This exclusive survey will be published in the October issue of Global Finance. The banks ranked 1-10 will be presented awards at a special ceremony to be held during the Annual Meetings of the IMF and World Bank in Washington in September.

For editorial information please contact: Andrea Fiano, Editor, email: afiano@gfmag.com

WORLD’S 50 SAFEST BANKS
1 KfW

(Germany)
26 United Overseas Bank

(Singapore)

2 Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (CDC)

(France)
27 Crédit Lyonnais

(France)

3 Bank Nederlandse Gemeenten (BNG)

(Netherlands)
28 Pohjola Bank

(Finland)

4
Zürcher Kantonalbank

(Switzerland)
29 Credit Suisse Group

(Switzerland)

5
Landwirtschaftliche Rentenbank

(Germany)
30 BMO Financial Group

(Canada)

6 Rabobank Group

(Netherlands)
Tie*31 Cassa Depositi e Prestiti

(Italy)

Tie*7
Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg – Förderbank

(Germany)
Tie*31
CIBC

(Canada)

Tie*7 Nederlandse Waterschapsbank

(Netherlands)
32 Banco Español de Crédito (Banesto)

(Spain)

8 Banque et Caisse d’Épargne de l’État

(Luxembourg)
33 Deutsche Bank

(Germany)

9 NRW.Bank

(Germany)
34 JPMorgan Chase

(United States)

10 Banco Santander

(Spain)
35 Société Générale

(France)

11 Royal Bank of Canada

(Canada)
36 Wells Fargo

(United States)

Tie*12 National Australia Bank Limited

(Australia)
37 Intesa Sanpaolo

(Italy)

Tie*12 Commonwealth Bank of Australia

(Australia)
38 China Development Bank

(China)

13 Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD Bank)

(Canada)
Tie*39 Banque Fédérative du Crédit Mutuel (BFCM)

(France)

14 Westpac Banking Corporation

(Australia)
Tie*39 Landesbank Baden-Württemberg

(Germany)

15 BNP Paribas

(France)
40 U.S. Bancorp

(United States)

16 HSBC Holdings

(United Kingdom)
41 Nationwide Building Society

(United Kingdom)

17 Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA)

(Spain)
42 Agricultural Development Bank of China

(China)

Tie*18 Scotiabank (Bank of Nova Scotia)

(Canada)
43 Shizuoka Bank

(Japan)

Tie*18 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group

(Australia)
44 Northern Trust Corporation

(United States)

19 DBS Bank

(Singapore)
45 CoBank, ACB

(United States)

20 Caisse centrale Desjardins

(Canada)
46 National Bank of Abu Dhabi

(United Arab Emirates)

21 Crédit Agricole

(France)
47 National Bank of Kuwait

(Kuwait)

22 Nordea Bank

(Sweden)
48 Pictet & Cie

(Switzerland)

23 Svenska Handelsbanken

(Sweden)
49 Barclays Group

(United Kingdom)

24 BNY Mellon

(United States)
50 Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ

(Japan)

25 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation

(Singapore)

*A tie is assigned when two banks with the same score have total assets withina $5 billion range.

PR date: Global Finance magazine August 18, 2011

Ratings as of: August 11, 2011
Back to Top

Read more: http://www.gfmag.com/tools/best-banks/11341-worlds-50-safest-banks-2011.html#ixzz1WKW3tYWc
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Share Alike
Get a FREE subscription to Global Finance magazine : http://www.gfmag.com/subscribe.html

Euro Zone is in Trouble -Part 1

In Jackson Hole, Wyoming, on Saturday, Jean-Claude Trichet, the president of the European Central Bank, was due to give a speech to a meeting of policy makers hosted by the Federal Reserve. As he prepared to speak, the euro zone faced huge problems.

 

Getty Images Jean-Claude Trichet

The second rescue package for Greece is in doubt, the euro zone’s banking system remains a major worry, and only ECB intervention has kept borrowing costs for Spain and Italy at sustainable levels.

Leaders across the euro zone appear unable to agree on the terms of the rescue of Greece, raising questions about how they would cope if the crisis took an even worse turn.

The head of the International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde, summed up the mood in her own speech to the meeting in Jackson Hole perfectly. “Developments this summer have indicated we are in dangerous new phase. The stakes are clear, we risk seeing a fragile recovery derailed, so we should act now.”

The former French Finance Minister said Europe’s banking industry needs to be recapitalized whilst warning fiscal policy must aim boost growth and monetary policy remain highly accommodative.

It is difficult to argue with Christine Lagarde, but despite the importance of her role, she is able to say these things without causing panic. As head of the ECB, Trichet cannot speak his mind in public amid so much economic, financial and political uncertainty.

On Sunday, the Sunday Times in the UK reported that policy makers in Brussels are drawing up radical plans to offer central guarantees over certain types of debt issued by banks. The move is reported to be a direct response to the sharp fall in U.S. funding for Europe’s banks. If true, this is clearly something the boss of the ECB can’t be discussing in public.

So as Trichet prepared for his speech, he turned to the history books and gave a master class on how to say something while actually saying nothing at all.

“Cracking open the Solovian black box of technical progress has taken us from theories of learning-by-doing, to the impact of R&D on product variety and quality,” said Trichet as he was about 5 minutes into the speech. The wire reporters must have been scratching their heads, which is exactly what I suspect was Trichet’s point. (Solovian growth is defined as economic growth brought about by investment. A black box is any system whose inner workings are unobservable—think Enron’s business model. At any rate, yes, he actuallly said that.)

“Going one step further, investigation of the sources of this growth dispersion in the U.S. and euro area economies reveals parallels even in the root causes of dispersion in economic performance and productivity,” continued the central bank governor, in a heroic attempt not to mention anything investors actually wanted to hear.

 

RELATED LINKS

Current DateTime: 04:49:22 28 Aug 2011
LinksList Documentid: 44304098

• Obama, IMF Chief Agree On Need to Boost Growth
• Bernanke Stays Course, Says Fed Will Consider Move in Sept.
• The World’s Safest Banks 2011

He went on to reiterate things he had said many times before.

“Finally, a priority for medium and long-run growth is that our policy institutions remain attuned to an ever-changing landscape. We have seen in recent years the near-Knightian uncertainty policy makers endured and how boldly they responded,” said Trichet before bringing it home.

“I have learned whilst discussing global imbalances and financial transmission channels — much of it done here at Jackson Hole — that appropriate improvements in regulation and multilateral surveillance frameworks can yield large gains. We should work hard to maintain momentum,” he said.

That is clearly not all you have learned, Mr. Trichet, as you prepare to stand down later this year. I suspect you will be meeting with your replacement, Italy’s Maria Draghi, to pass on this incredibly important skill for a central banker in a time of crisis.

Is Netflix Heading Lower?

NEW YORK — Netflix is trying to boost business by chopping its services into two separate parts. Unfortunately for investors, the company’s stock price is what’s really been cleaved.

The company that once seemed like it could do no wrong has seen its stock lose half its value in the last two months. Netflix tumbled another 7.4 percent to $143.75 on Monday, on the same day that chief executive Reed Hastings sent an email to Netflix customers, announcing that the DVD-by-mail business that defined the company for much of its history will become a separate, renamed service called Qwikster. Customers who subscribe to both streaming and DVDs will soon see two separate charges on their credit card statements and have to log on to two different websites.

It’s a hard landing for a company that made many investors rich while remaking the way that households watch movies. It was only ten months ago that Netflix’s success prompted Standard and Poor’s to add the company to its S&P 500 index, a broad measure of the stock market that is the basis for most U.S. mutual funds. Since then, Netflix shares have dropped 26 percent. Some analysts now think the stock’s best days are behind it, beset by increased competition and its recent corporate blunders.

“Clearly the company is not going to grow at the rate that it has in the past few years,” said Michael Corty, an analyst at Morningstar who covers Netflix.

Two years ago, the company traded at around $45 a share. Its subscriber base was swelling at a rate of 25 percent a year as customers were drawn by the value of rental plans that included no late fees for DVDs and unlimited streaming of movies and television shows. The company was so successful at adding new customers that some analysts predicted it wouldn’t be long until consumers cut their cable cords and relied on Netflix alone for content.

Rising profits and a booming subscriber base helped lift Netflix’s stock price 219 percent last year to $175.70. As recently as February, investors were willing to pay $93 for $1 in the company’s profits. The broad S&P 500 index, meanwhile, traded at a price to earnings ratio of 16.

But the last two months have upended those rosy growth scenarios. Since announcing higher prices on July 12, the company’s stock has plunged 51 percent from a high of $298.73. Netflix announced on September 15 that its subscribers will fall to 24 million U.S. households at the end of the month – only the second time in the company’s history that its subscriber base has dropped from one quarter to the next. And the company faces increased competition from Amazon, Apple and a host of others, which will likely drive its costs higher.

“Netflix was basically a monopoly in the streaming business until about six months ago, and the effect was that content providers were underpricing their products,” said Charlie Wolf, an analyst who covers the company at Needham. On February 22nd, Amazon announced that it would stream 5,000 movies and television shows at no additional charge to customers who signed up for a Prime membership, which costs $79 a year.

Wolf said that increased competition among streaming companies meant that the balance of power was tipping back to the movie studios and networks that produce entertainment. These companies can now play Netflix and its competitors off of one another, creating higher profits for themselves and forcing streaming companies to raise their prices or cut into their margins. Netflix recently lost its license to stream popular movies from Starz Entertainment over a dispute over fees.

Streaming isn’t the only aspect of Netflix’s business that is coming under fire. Its traditional DVD business is also being challenged by Redbox, a division of Coinstar Inc. that rents DVDs at 33,330 kiosks in supermarkets and other retailers. Coinstar’s stock is up 6 percent over the last six months, compared with a 32 percent drop for Netflix.

Wolf thinks Netflix shares should trade at a fair value of $130 _a 10 percent drop from Monday’s closing price.

Other analysts believe Netflix is bungling Qwikster’s rollout. “Netflix has built such a strong brand name, so to switch the name of the website now doesn’t make a lot of sense to me,” said Corty, the analyst at Morningstar.

He said any marketing or executive missteps could come back to hurt the company as its business faces more competition and potentially higher costs. Corty said, the new emphasis on streaming means Netflix will have to constantly renegotiate its licenses to stream movies, giving the companies that produce entertainment more leverage.

Corty says that he wouldn’t recommend buying Netflix until its shares fall to $90 _a 37 percent drop from its current price.

But even amid the gloom about Netflix’s future direction, there are some investors sitting on gains and holding onto the stock because they assume more are to come. Jeanie Wyatt, the chief investment officer for South Texas Money Management, a firm with $1.9 billion in assets under management, began buying Netflix when it was trading at $120.

Her investment was once up 150 percent. Now it’s up just 25 percent. Even so, she attributed the company’s recent tumbles to growing pains. She believes the company will continue to perform better than the overall stock market over the next several years, in part because Qwikster will also rent video games by mail – a first for the company.

“I don’t think that this is a growth story that’s broken,” she said.

We Need To Get Out of The Vicious Cycle

Vicious Cycle

• Go To Our Facebook Page
  Ken Kapur
  
  Create Your Badge
• Get your free

  First Chapter of Dodging The Depression

  Get your free First Chapter on how to Dodge The Depression & Increase Your Wealth

  Just enter your first name & e-mail

  

  Name:

  Email:

  

  **Double-check your email for accuracy to ensure you receive your free mini course.

  Privacy Assured:
  Your email address is never
  shared with anyone
• Down Load Now

  By Ordering now, you will be able to download immediately Ebook version for not $29.95 but only $9.

  We all know nothing lasts forever, and birth, youth, maturity, old age, and death are all cyclical.

  This period that we are going through will also end. The question is how do we ride this wave and enjoy the thrill of it while increasing the prosperity of our Children & Grandchildren.

  

  My 100% RISK-FREE MONEY BACK GUARANTEE TO YOU Simply order "Dodging The Depression" right now - you can download and be reading it within 5 minutes. Read it from cover to cover - trust me, once you start reading, you will not be able to put it down! If for any reason you're not 100% happy and in love with this eBook, simply send me an email within 30 days and I will refund to you, the full purchase price - no questions asked. The risk is completely, 100% on me! You have nothing to lose...you will have my 100% RISK-FREE money back guarantee to protect your investment! But...You can keep the eBook no matter what, as my way of thanking you for having faith in my product.

©Copyright www.dodgingthedepression.com 2011

• About
• Contact Us
• Privacy Policy
• Site Map
• Terms Of Use